Planning appeal decision
Land to the West of Tilgate Forest Lodge, Brighton Road, Pease Pottage, Sussex, RH11 9AF
Planning appeal 3251365 at Land to the West of Tilgate Forest Lodge, Brighton Road, Pease Pottage, Sussex, RH11 9AF (Mid Sussex District Council) was dismissed on 24 June 2021 by Inspector Buchanan R, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposed development would be in an accessible location, giving a genuine choice for travel by modes other than the private car.
a 70 bedroom care home (Use Class C2) arranged over two storeys (and ancillary accommodation within the roof space) together with associated communal spaces, back of house and service areas, car and cycle parking, landscaping and planting. Erection of clubhouse building and new access point onto Brighton Road (B2114)
- Authority
- Mid Sussex District Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- community-institutional · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Buchanan R
- Postcode
- RH11 9AF
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposed development would be in an accessible location, giving a genuine choice for travel by modes other than the private car
- its effect on the character and appearance of the area, having particular regard to the High Weald Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB)
- whether there is a need for C2 registered care home bedspaces
What decided it
The combination of the site's inaccessible location (substantial weight) and the major adverse, important harm to the character and appearance of the High Weald AONB (great weight) outweighed the benefits of meeting care home need.
Appreciable weight to meeting older persons' care need and moderate weight to infrastructure and employment benefits were outweighed by substantial weight to the inaccessible location and great weight to harm to the AONB, tipping the balance against the proposal and against accordance with the development plan.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DP21Policy DP12Policy DP16Policy 1 of the Slaugham Neighbourhood PlanPolicy DP30Policy DP20Policy DP6
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 102Paragraph 103Paragraph 108Paragraph 172Paragraph 170Paragraph 59Paragraph 61Paragraph 92Paragraph 54Paragraph 56
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Mid Sussex
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Dismissed22 October 2026601278111 Barnfield, Balcombe, RH17 6FW
- Dismissed9 October 20266010262Development Site At Former Tower Car Sales, Tower Close, East Grinstead, RH19 3BY
- Dismissed10 September 20266011079Moonshine Meadow, Cuckfield Road, Ansty, RH17 5AL
- Allowed27 August 20266010382Grassed Verge of Kings Way, Burgess Hill, RH15 0EA
- Allowed6 August 2026601051636 Trubwick Avenue, Haywards Heath, RH16 4UR
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®