Planning appeal decision
Land At Knightsbridge Drive, Newbury Road, Headley, Hampshire, RG19 8JZ
Planning appeal 3251951 at Land At Knightsbridge Drive, Newbury Road, Headley, Hampshire, RG19 8JZ (Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council) was allowed on 11 November 2022 by Inspector Dakeyne M, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the use would result in a sustainable pattern of development, with particular reference to accessibility to services and integration with the local community.
the use of land for the stationing of caravans for residential purposes and erection of 4 no utility/dayrooms
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Minor traveller and caravan pitches
- Inspector
- Dakeyne M
- Postcode
- RG19 8JZ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the use would result in a sustainable pattern of development, with particular reference to accessibility to services and integration with the local community
- the effect on the character and appearance of the area, including on existing trees
- the effect on biodiversity
- the effect on the setting of the designated heritage asset of Knightsbridge House
- whether the proposal would result in a suitable living environment for future occupiers, with particular reference to noise levels
- the need for and provision of sites
What decided it
The identified need for further traveller pitches, the lack of a five-year supply of deliverable sites, and the settled-base benefits for the households outweighed the limited harms to character, biodiversity and heritage setting.
The localised, moderate-weight harms to character and appearance and biodiversity, and the less-than-substantial (lower end) harm to the setting of Knightsbridge House, were outweighed by the public benefits of meeting an identified need for traveller pitches and providing a settled base for the households, so the balance favoured allowing the appeal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CN5Policy EM1Policy EM10Policy EM11Policy EM4Policy EM12
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 202
- Judgments
- Smith v SSLUHC & Ors [2022] EWCA Civ 1391
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Basingstoke and Deane
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Allowed26 October 2026600755075 Park Prewett Road, Basingstoke, RG24 9RG
- Dismissed6 August 20266007440Land West Of Millars, Station Road, Cliddesden, RG25 2FG
- Allowed10 July 20266004025Basingstoke Sports and Social Club, Fairfields Road, Basingstoke, RG21 3DR
- Allowed19 June 20266005805White Bungalow, Ash Lane, Silchester, RG7 2NL
- Allowed16 June 20266004924Newlyn House, North of West Ham Lane, Basingstoke, RG22 5EE
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®