Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed6 August 20266007440

Land West Of Millars, Station Road, Cliddesden, RG25 2FG

Planning appeal 6007440 at Land West Of Millars, Station Road, Cliddesden, RG25 2FG (Basingstoke and Deane) was dismissed on 6 August 2026 by Inspector Laura Cuthbert, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposed development would provide a suitable location for housing, having regard to the development strategy for the area, opportunities for sustainable transport, accessibility to services and facilities, and the transition to a low carbon future.

No.4 New Dwellings

Appeal type
minor · Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Inspector
Laura Cuthbert
Postcode
RG25 2FG

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed development would provide a suitable location for housing, having regard to the development strategy for the area, opportunities for sustainable transport, accessibility to services and facilities, and the transition to a low carbon future
  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • Whether the proposal would comply with local and national planning policy which seeks to steer new development away from areas at risk of flooding
  • The effect of the development on highway safety, with specific regard to vehicular access
  • Whether the proposal would make adequate provision for Biodiversity Net Gain (BNG)

What decided it

The failure to demonstrate that the proposal would be safe from current and future surface water flood risk throughout its lifetime, which engaged paragraph 11(d)(i) of the Framework and displaced the presumption in favour of sustainable development.

The housing supply benefits and social and economic benefits of four dwellings were outweighed by the failure to demonstrate safety from surface water flooding (which engaged the strong reason exception in paragraph 11(d)(i)), combined with substantial harm to character and appearance and the unsuitability of the location for housing due to lack of sustainable transport opportunities and accessibility to services.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SS1Policy SS6Policy SD1Policy CN9Policy EM1Policy EM10Policy EM7Policy EM4Policy DD1Policy DD2Policy DD3Policy TM1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 83Paragraph 84Paragraph 175
Judgments
Braintree District Council v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2018] EWCA Civ 610; City and Country Bramshill v SSHCLG [2021] EWCA Civ 320

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

18 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Basingstoke and Deane

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Allowed19 June 20266005805
    White Bungalow, Ash Lane, Silchester, RG7 2NL
  2. Allowed16 June 20266004924
    Newlyn House, North of West Ham Lane, Basingstoke, RG22 5EE
  3. Allowed11 June 20266002358
    Land at Lower Wyke, St Mary Bourne, SP116AW
  4. Allowed26 May 20263375485
    Land North Of Whitchurch Station, Whitchurch, RG28 7ED
  5. Dismissed18 November 20253355280
    Locksbridge Farm, Cufaude Lane, Bramley, RG26 5DL

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.