Planning appeal decision
Land West Of Millars, Station Road, Cliddesden, RG25 2FG
No.4 New Dwellings
- Authority
- Basingstoke and Deane
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- residential
- Postcode
- RG25 2FG
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposed development would provide a suitable location for housing, having regard to the development strategy for the area, opportunities for sustainable transport, accessibility to services and facilities, and the transition to a low carbon future
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
- Whether the proposal would comply with local and national planning policy which seeks to steer new development away from areas at risk of flooding
- The effect of the development on highway safety, with specific regard to vehicular access
- Whether the proposal would make adequate provision for Biodiversity Net Gain (BNG)
What decided it
The failure to demonstrate that the proposal would be safe from current and future surface water flood risk throughout its lifetime, which engaged paragraph 11(d)(i) of the Framework and displaced the presumption in favour of sustainable development.
The housing supply benefits and social and economic benefits of four dwellings were outweighed by the failure to demonstrate safety from surface water flooding (which engaged the strong reason exception in paragraph 11(d)(i)), combined with substantial harm to character and appearance and the unsuitability of the location for housing due to lack of sustainable transport opportunities and accessibility to services.
Framework references: 11, 83, 84, 175
Plan policies cited: Policy SS1, Policy SS6, Policy SD1, Policy CN9, Policy EM1, Policy EM10, Policy EM7, Policy EM4, Policy DD1, Policy DD2, Policy DD3, Policy TM1
Judgments cited: Braintree District Council v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2018] EWCA Civ 610; City and Country Bramshill v SSHCLG [2021] EWCA Civ 320
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®