Planning appeal decision
Land off Green Lane, Outwood, Redhill, Surrey, RH1 5QR
Planning appeal 3252200 at Land off Green Lane, Outwood, Redhill, Surrey, RH1 5QR (Tandridge District Council) was allowed on 14 February 2023 by Inspector Murray D, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect on the openness of the Green Belt.
the change of use of land for the stationing of caravans for residential purposes for 2 Gypsy pitches, together with the formation of a hardstanding and utility/day rooms ancillary to that use and erection of a stable
- Authority
- Tandridge District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Minor traveller and caravan pitches
- Inspector
- Murray D
- Postcode
- RH1 5QR
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect on the openness of the Green Belt
- The effect on the character and appearance of the area
- The effect on biodiversity
- The need for traveller sites locally and whether the Council can demonstrate a five year supply of new sites
- The intended occupiers' personal circumstances including the best interests of any children
- Whether the harm due to inappropriateness, and any other harm is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to constitute very special circumstances
What decided it
The unmet need for Gypsy and Traveller pitches, the lack of alternative sites, and the Council's continuing failure to allocate sites clearly outweighed the Green Belt and landscape harm, justifying very special circumstances for a temporary permission.
The harm from inappropriate development and limited to moderate harm to Green Belt openness, together with limited landscape harm, was outweighed by the unmet need for Gypsy and Traveller sites, the absence of alternative sites and the Council's continuing policy failure, tipping the balance in favour of a temporary five-year permission rather than a permanent one.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CSP9Policy DP10Policy CSP21
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 149Paragraph 150Paragraph 174
- Judgments
- Smith v SSHCLG & Others [2022] EWCA Civ 1391
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Tandridge District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Allowed29 October 20266006369Land at Thornhill, Westerham Road, Limpsfield, Oxted, RH8 0ED
- Dismissed14 October 20266008351Development Site West of Southwood, Waller Lane, Caterham, CR3 5EA
- Dismissed13 October 20266007518Rosemary Cottage, Smallfield Road, Horne, Horley, RH6 9JP
- Dismissed23 September 20266008688Land Adjacent to Farm View Cottage, Lingfield Road, East Grinstead, RH19 2JW
- Dismissed22 September 20266011736Land Adjacent to Oaklands Drive, Copthorne Bank, Copthorne, RH10 3JD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®