Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed12 November 20213253482

579 - 589 Kingston Road, Raynes Park, London, SW20 8DR

Planning appeal 3253482 at 579 - 589 Kingston Road, Raynes Park, London, SW20 8DR (London Borough of Merton) was allowed on 12 November 2021 by Inspector MacLeod R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: for both Appeals, the adequacy of the proposed housing to provide an appropriate mix of smaller and larger units.

redevelopment of site to provide Class B1 (offices) and Class C3 (residential) units in buildings of two – seven storeys, provision of car and cycle parking, vehicle access, landscaping, plant and associated works

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
MacLeod R
Postcode
SW20 8DR

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • for both Appeals, the adequacy of the proposed housing to provide an appropriate mix of smaller and larger units
  • for Appeal A, the impact of the proposal's massing in relation to a sense of enclosure for future occupiers and on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
  • for both Appeals, the requirement for a planning obligation to cover other planning issues and the adequacy of the documents submitted

What decided it

The site's location near Raynes Park town centre and station, combined with the Build to Rent nature of the schemes and London Plan policies supporting flexible housing mix requirements in such locations, justified departure from the indicative housing mix proportions in the local plan, and the additional massing in Appeal A would not result in unacceptable impacts on character, appearance or living conditions.

The benefits of housing delivery and optimisation of housing potential on a sustainably located site, combined with the acceptable design and massing of the proposals, outweighed any concerns about the departure from indicative housing mix proportions.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DMH2Policy H10Policy H11Policy DMD2Policy CS14Policy D3
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

244 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Merton

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed23 October 20266006717
    71 Leamington Avenue, Morden, SM4 4DQ
  2. Dismissed21 October 20266008957
    18, West Place, London, SW19 4UH
  3. Notice upheld21 September 20263364443
    31 Glebe Avenue, Mitcham, CR4 3DZ
  4. Allowed7 August 20266007543
    11B Calonne Road, Merton, Wimbledon, SW19 8HH
  5. Dismissed17 July 20266006955
    35 Kingston Road, London, SW19 1JW

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.