Planning appeal decision
Ash Tree Paddock, Stanbridge Road, Great Billington, Leighton Buzzard, LU7 9JH
Planning appeal 3253835 at Ash Tree Paddock, Stanbridge Road, Great Billington, Leighton Buzzard, LU7 9JH (Central Bedfordshire) was dismissed on 7 July 2022 by Inspector Gilbert-Wooldridge T, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt.
described on the application form as one additional pitch on land adjacent to an existing Gypsy site. The new pitch to contain one static caravan, one touring caravan, parking for two vehicles with associated hardstanding, septic tanks/water treatment plants and associated infrastructure
- Authority
- Central Bedfordshire
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Minor traveller and caravan pitches
- Inspector
- Gilbert-Wooldridge T
- Postcode
- LU7 9JH
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposal on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- the effect of the proposal on the Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation (SAC)
- whether any harm to the Green Belt, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations (including the need for gypsy and traveller sites and the personal circumstances of the occupiers of the site) so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The other considerations, including personal circumstances and unmet need, did not clearly outweigh the harm to the Green Belt so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify inappropriate development.
the substantial weight given to Green Belt harm and moderate weight to character and appearance harm were not clearly outweighed by the other considerations (limited weight to unmet non-PPTS need and roadside existence risk; considerable weight to personal circumstances), so very special circumstances did not exist and the appeal was dismissed
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- SP4SP8H7H7(2)H7(5)EE5HQ1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 137Paragraph 138Paragraph 147Paragraph 148Paragraph 62Paragraph 174
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Central Bedfordshire
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Dismissed15 September 20266007334Hillcrest, Chalton, Luton, LU4 9UB
- Allowed4 September 202660072022 Park Farm, Park Road, Westoning, MK45 5LA
- Dismissed7 August 20266007254Wheatsheaf Barn, Mount Pleasant, Aspley Guise, MK178JZ
- Dismissed10 July 20266005439263 Sharpenhoe Road, Streatley, LU3 3PP
- Dismissed8 July 20266007697142 Sharpenhoe Road, Streatley, Luton, LU3 3PS
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®