Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed11 April 20223254288

57 - 59 Beak Street, London, W1F 9SF

Planning appeal 3254288 at 57 - 59 Beak Street, London, W1F 9SF (City of Westminster Council) was allowed on 11 April 2022 by Inspector Cullen F, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed variation of condition 1 on the appearance of Nos 57-59 Beak Street.

use of basement and part ground as dual alternative shop (Class A1) or restaurant (Class A3) and installation of roof level kitchen extract plant. Alterations to shopfront. Erection of extensions at rear second, third and fourth floor levels in order to enlarge existing office (Class B1). Installation of an internally routed extract duct terminating above roof level. Relocation of existing plant and screening at roof level’, without complying with conditions attached to planning permission Ref: 18/08655/FULL, dated 20 December 2018

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
mixed-use · Minor retail and services
Inspector
Cullen F
Postcode
W1F 9SJ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed variation of condition 1 on the appearance of Nos 57-59 Beak Street
  • the effect of the proposed variation of condition 1 on the character and appearance of the Soho Conservation Area

What decided it

The rear elevation of the host building is of minimal architectural quality and interest, having already been compromised by previous changes, and the proposal would not harm the appearance of the building or the character and appearance of the conservation area.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 38Policy 39Policy D3Policy HC1

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

At least 815 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in City of Westminster Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed28 October 20266012339
    1 Bear Street, London, WC2H 7DZ
  2. Dismissed28 October 20266009920
    25 Monmouth Road, London, W2 4UT
  3. Dismissed21 October 20266014604
    South Terrace, Third and Fourth Floor, 4 Matthew Parker Street, London, SW1H 9NP
  4. Dismissed21 October 20266012002
    Flat B, 9 Durham Terrace, London, W2 5PB
  5. Allowed21 October 20266011405
    17 Bruton Street, London, W1J 6QB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.