Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld6 June 20223254360

53 Wakeman Hills Avenue, London, NW9 0TA

Without planning permission, the erection of a two-storey side and rear extension, single-storey rear extension, rear dormer window and roof extension

Authority
London Borough of Brent
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Harwood A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether what is alleged constitutes a breach of planning control
  • Whether at the date the notice was issued it was too late to take enforcement action
  • Whether the steps required exceed what is necessary to achieve the purpose of the notice
  • Whether the period specified in the notice falls short of what should reasonably be allowed

What decided it

The appellant failed to demonstrate on the balance of probabilities that the development was substantially completed 4 years before the notice was issued, and failed to prove that lesser steps than full demolition were necessary to remedy the breach.

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.