Planning appeal decision
Surrey Hill House, Tandridge Hill Lane, Godstone, RH9 8DD
Planning appeal 3254788 at Surrey Hill House, Tandridge Hill Lane, Godstone, RH9 8DD (Tandridge District Council) was dismissed on 9 November 2021 by Inspector Holden S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to relevant development plan policy and the revised Framework.
conversion, extension and alteration of existing buildings to create 4 dwellings
- Authority
- Tandridge District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Holden S
- Postcode
- RH9 8DD
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to relevant development plan policy and the revised Framework
- whether the site is suitable for additional residential development having regard to its accessibility to services and facilities
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- whether the site could be provided with safe and suitable access
- whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt that would harm openness and encroach into the countryside, and these substantial harms are not clearly outweighed by the limited benefits of additional housing and economic activity, so very special circumstances do not exist.
The substantial harm from inappropriateness, loss of openness and encroachment into the countryside was not outweighed by the very limited benefits of additional housing provision and construction-period economic benefits, so very special circumstances were not established.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DP10Policy DP13Policy CSP1Policy DP5Policy CSP18Policy DP7Policy CSP12
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 147Paragraph 149Paragraph 150Paragraph 105Paragraph 79Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Tandridge District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Allowed29 October 20266006369Land at Thornhill, Westerham Road, Limpsfield, Oxted, RH8 0ED
- Dismissed14 October 20266008351Development Site West of Southwood, Waller Lane, Caterham, CR3 5EA
- Dismissed13 October 20266007518Rosemary Cottage, Smallfield Road, Horne, Horley, RH6 9JP
- Dismissed23 September 20266008688Land Adjacent to Farm View Cottage, Lingfield Road, East Grinstead, RH19 2JW
- Dismissed22 September 20266011736Land Adjacent to Oaklands Drive, Copthorne Bank, Copthorne, RH10 3JD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®