Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed10 June 20213254897

Fitzherbert House, 29A Montpelier Row, Twickenham, TW1 2NQ

Planning appeal 3254897 at Fitzherbert House, 29A Montpelier Row, Twickenham, TW1 2NQ (Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council) was dismissed on 10 June 2021 by Inspector Wood T, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effects of the proposal on the heritage assets.

the erection of a two and a half storey 3 bedroomed dwellinghouse including accommodation in the roof plus a basement and associated hard and soft landscaping, cycle and refuse stores; alterations to boundary wall along Orleans Road. Appeal B: APP/L5810/Y/20/3254897 Fitzherbert House, 29A Montpelier Row, Twickenham TW1 2NQ

Authority
Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council
Appeal type
other · Listed Building Consent & Conservation Area Consent Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Wood T
Postcode
TW1 2NQ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effects of the proposal on the heritage assets
  • The effects of the siting and design of the proposal
  • The effects of the proposed basement
  • Flood risk
  • Fire safety

What decided it

The harm to the heritage assets, particularly the setting of the listed building and the character and appearance of the conservation area, outweighed the modest benefits of the proposal.

The modest benefits of providing an additional family home, affordable housing contribution, ecological enhancements and construction jobs were insufficient to outweigh the less than substantial harm to the heritage assets and conflict with the development plan

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy LP11Policy LP1Policy LP3Policy LP39

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

464 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Richmond upon Thames

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed28 October 20266015879
    88 Colne Road, Twickenham, TW2 6QE
  2. Dismissed28 October 20266015836
    64 First Avenue, Mortlake, London, SW14 8SR
  3. Dismissed26 October 20266011874
    61-63 Petersham Road, Richmond Upon Thames, TW10 6UT
  4. Dismissed20 October 20266010388
    163 Garrick House, High Street, Hampton Hill, TW12 1BZ
  5. Dismissed19 October 20266013760
    Pavement Os, 53-57 High Street, Whitton, TW2 7LB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.