Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed4 January 20223255114

Unit 2, Ten Acres, Cemetery Lane, Woodmancote, West Sussex, PO10 8RZ

Planning appeal 3255114 at Unit 2, Ten Acres, Cemetery Lane, Woodmancote, West Sussex, PO10 8RZ (Chichester District Council) was dismissed on 4 January 2022 by Inspector Edwards S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the appeal site constitutes a suitable location for the development, having regard to local and national planning policies.

change of use of site for B8 storage of privately owned and commercial vehicles, with ancillary offices and stores (retrospective)

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
employment-industrial · Change of use
Inspector
Edwards S
Postcode
PO10 8RZ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the appeal site constitutes a suitable location for the development, having regard to local and national planning policies
  • The effect of the development on the rural character and appearance of the surrounding countryside, and the living conditions of neighbouring residents, with particular regard to outlook
  • The effect of the development on the provision of Gypsies, Travellers and Travelling Showpersons' plots

What decided it

The appeal site does not constitute a suitable location for B8 storage use as it fails to meet the cumulative requirements of local plan policy for countryside development, and the scheme causes unacceptable harm to rural character, appearance and neighbouring amenity.

The benefits associated with the development, including the use of previously developed land, were outweighed by the harm to rural character, appearance, neighbouring living conditions and loss of an approved Travelling Showperson plot, with no exceptional circumstances to justify consent.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 2Policy 45Policy 46Policy 1Policy 3Policy 33Policy 48Policy 36Policy OA1Policy OA2Policy LD1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 130Paragraph 62Paragraph 74

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

45 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Chichester

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed23 October 20266009623
    Friars House, 52a East Street, Chichester, PO19 1JG
  2. Dismissed15 October 20266010948
    Pendrills, Mill Lane, Fishbourne, PO19 3JN
  3. Dismissed5 October 20266011850
    8 Gloucester Way, Chichester, PO19 5DL
  4. Dismissed2 October 20266011615
    1, Harberton Crescent, Chichester, PO19 5NY
  5. Allowed30 September 20266014666
    Lerryn, West Strand, West Wittering, Chichester, PO20 8AU

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.