Planning appeal decision
Unit 2, Ten Acres, Cemetery Lane, Woodmancote, West Sussex, PO10 8RZ
Planning appeal 3255114 at Unit 2, Ten Acres, Cemetery Lane, Woodmancote, West Sussex, PO10 8RZ (Chichester District Council) was dismissed on 4 January 2022 by Inspector Edwards S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the appeal site constitutes a suitable location for the development, having regard to local and national planning policies.
change of use of site for B8 storage of privately owned and commercial vehicles, with ancillary offices and stores (retrospective)
- Authority
- Chichester District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- employment-industrial · Change of use
- Inspector
- Edwards S
- Postcode
- PO10 8RZ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the appeal site constitutes a suitable location for the development, having regard to local and national planning policies
- The effect of the development on the rural character and appearance of the surrounding countryside, and the living conditions of neighbouring residents, with particular regard to outlook
- The effect of the development on the provision of Gypsies, Travellers and Travelling Showpersons' plots
What decided it
The appeal site does not constitute a suitable location for B8 storage use as it fails to meet the cumulative requirements of local plan policy for countryside development, and the scheme causes unacceptable harm to rural character, appearance and neighbouring amenity.
The benefits associated with the development, including the use of previously developed land, were outweighed by the harm to rural character, appearance, neighbouring living conditions and loss of an approved Travelling Showperson plot, with no exceptional circumstances to justify consent.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy 2Policy 45Policy 46Policy 1Policy 3Policy 33Policy 48Policy 36Policy OA1Policy OA2Policy LD1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 130Paragraph 62Paragraph 74
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Chichester
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Dismissed23 October 20266009623Friars House, 52a East Street, Chichester, PO19 1JG
- Dismissed15 October 20266010948Pendrills, Mill Lane, Fishbourne, PO19 3JN
- Dismissed5 October 202660118508 Gloucester Way, Chichester, PO19 5DL
- Dismissed2 October 202660116151, Harberton Crescent, Chichester, PO19 5NY
- Allowed30 September 20266014666Lerryn, West Strand, West Wittering, Chichester, PO20 8AU
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®