Planning appeal decision
Former Wylde Green Public House Site, Birmingham Road, Sutton Coldfield, B72 1DH
Planning appeal 3255763 at Former Wylde Green Public House Site, Birmingham Road, Sutton Coldfield, B72 1DH (Birmingham City Council) was allowed on 7 October 2021 by Inspector Dawe A, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area, with particular regard to the length of the building frontage and the length, at the proposed height, of the rear wing.
for Specialist Accommodation for the Elderly consisting of apartments with care, communal facilities, parking and associated private amenity space
- Authority
- Birmingham City Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Dawe A
- Postcode
- B72 1DH
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area, with particular regard to the length of the building frontage and the length, at the proposed height, of the rear wing
- Having regard to the loss of the bowling green on the site, whether or not a financial contribution towards facilities elsewhere locally, through a planning obligation, would be necessary or directly related to the proposed development
What decided it
The absence of any unacceptable harm to character and appearance, combined with the failure of the bowling green contribution to meet the CIL necessity tests, meant there was no sustainable basis to refuse the appeal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy PG3Policy 3.14 (saved policy, paragraphs 3.14C&D)Policy TP11Policy TP9Policy TP27Policy TP39
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 57
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Birmingham City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Allowed21 October 20266012934157, Somerford Road, Birmingham, B29 5LB
- Dismissed20 October 20266011877248 Wheelwright Rd, Erdington, Birmingam, B24 8EH
- Allowed6 October 2026600642839 Gladstone Road, Sparkbrook, Birmingham, B11 1LP
- Allowed17 September 20266009473Unit 9a, Bikdale Avenue, Birmingham, B29 6UB
- Dismissed11 September 2026601108812 Sladefield Road, Ward End, Birmingham, B83NX
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®