Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed15 October 20213256769

Land Adj Ramblers, Eastwood Rise, Eastwood, Essex, SS9 5BS

Planning appeal 3256769 at Land Adj Ramblers, Eastwood Rise, Eastwood, Essex, SS9 5BS (Rochford District Council) was dismissed on 15 October 2021 by Inspector Osgathorp C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposed development would make satisfactory provision for foul drainage, with particular regard to the effect on the environment.

outline planning permission for the demolition of the existing structures and replacement with two detached dwellings along with associated works with all matters reserved apart from access

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Osgathorp C
Postcode
SS9 5BS

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed development would make satisfactory provision for foul drainage, with particular regard to the effect on the environment
  • The effect of the proposed development on land stability

What decided it

The absence of sufficient information to demonstrate that the proposed private sewage treatment plant would not pose an unacceptable risk of water pollution to the adjacent ditch and River Roach, combined with unclear maintenance arrangements for the shared system.

The moderate benefits of housing delivery and economic contribution were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the significant harm from the unacceptable risk of water pollution arising from inadequate foul drainage provision.

What the Inspector cited

National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 60Paragraph 69Paragraph 174Paragraph 183Paragraph 185

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

101 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Rochford

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Allowed9 July 20266004863
    9 College Gardens, Rochford, SS4 1YL
  2. Allowed23 October 20253364836
    Land Rear of 17 Hillside Road, Hockley, Essex, SS5 4RT
  3. Allowed6 August 20253353686
    Riverview, Land End of Oakfield Road, Hockley, Essex, SS5 5JY
  4. Allowed17 April 20253353859
    Land Adjacent to 1 Disraeli Road, Rayleigh, Essex, SS6 8XP
  5. Allowed26 February 20253346050
    Grove Road, Rayleigh, Essex, SS6 8UA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.