Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed6 August 20253353686

Riverview, Land End of Oakfield Road, Hockley, Essex, SS5 5JY

Planning appeal 3353686 at Riverview, Land End of Oakfield Road, Hockley, Essex, SS5 5JY (Rochford District Council) was allowed on 6 August 2025 by Inspector Carpenter C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies.

Proposed removal of existing units and provide single storey dwelling and associated parking and amenity”

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Carpenter C
Postcode
SS5 5JY

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • the effect of the proposal on the integrity of protected European sites
  • whether the statutory biodiversity net gain objective would be capable of being met

What decided it

The proposal constitutes acceptable partial redevelopment of previously developed land in the Green Belt under Framework paragraph 154(g) because the reduction in built footprint and volume and consolidation of structures would not cause substantial harm to openness, and the secured RAMS contribution and demonstrated BNG information requirements resolve the other main issues.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
GB1GB2DM10ENV1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 154

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

60 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Rochford

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed1 October 20266008122
    Milan Villa, Hyde Wood Lane , Canewdon, Rochford, SS4 3RR
  2. Notice varied and upheld2 September 20263372996
    Land at Limehouse Nursery (Also Known As 401 Eastwood Road), The Drive, Rayleigh, Essex, SS6 7LJ
  3. Allowed9 July 20266004863
    9 College Gardens, Rochford, SS4 1YL
  4. Dismissed4 June 20266006133
    The Barns, Blounts Farm, Murrels Lane, SS5 6AB
  5. Dismissed5 May 20266001653
    St. Mary’s House, Rectory Road, Hawkwell, SS5 4LL

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.