Planning appeal decision
Land to the North East of Telegraph Hill, Honingham, Norwich, NR9 5AT
Planning appeal 3258122 at Land to the North East of Telegraph Hill, Honingham, Norwich, NR9 5AT (Broadland District Council) was dismissed on 9 July 2021 by Inspector Castle S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area.
erection of two detached one and a half storey dwellings
- Authority
- Broadland District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Castle S
- Postcode
- NR9 5AT
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
- The effects of the proposal on the safe operation of the highway network in the vicinity of the appeal site
- Whether or not the appeal site is a suitable location for new housing
What decided it
The proposal conflicts with the development plan on three material grounds—character and appearance, highway safety, and location suitability—and the Council can demonstrate a five-year housing land supply, so the tilted balance does not apply and the development plan is determinative.
The limited economic and social benefits of two dwellings and a marginal contribution to housing supply did not outweigh the significant harm to character and appearance, unacceptable highway safety impacts, and unsuitability of location in the open countryside remote from services and sustainable transport.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy 2 of the Broadland, Norwich and South Norfolk Joint Core Strategy 2014Policy GC2 of the Broadland Development Management Development Plan Document 2015Policy GC4 of the Broadland Development Management Development Plan Document 2015Policy EN2 of the Broadland Development Management Development Plan Document 2015Policy TS3 of the Broadland Development Management Development Plan Document 2015Policy TS4 of the Broadland Development Management Development Plan Document 2015Policy GC1 of the Broadland Development Management Development Plan Document 2015JCS Policy 1JCS Policy 6JCS Policy 17
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 170Paragraph 127Paragraph 108Paragraph 109Paragraph 79Paragraph 213Paragraph 11Paragraph 78Paragraph 91
- Judgments
- Braintree DC v SSCLG, Greyread Ltd & Granville Developments Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 610
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Broadland
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Allowed19 October 20266008376Plough Meadow, Land South Of Hall Road, Alderford, Norwich, NR9 5NQ
- Allowed14 October 20266007160Land North of Aylsham Road, East of Holt Road (British National Grid Coordinates 615529 (Easting) 325042 (Northing).), Cawston, NR10 4HR
- Allowed23 September 2026601128337 Town Lane, Aylsham, NR11 6HH
- Dismissed4 August 20266008950Land at 52 Gordon Avenue, Norwich, NR7 0DP
- Dismissed9 July 20266004893Land Adjoining Tunstall Road, Halvergate, NR13 3PN
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®