Planning appeal decision
14 Southminster Road, Tillingham, Essex, CM0 7UF
Planning appeal 3260695 at 14 Southminster Road, Tillingham, Essex, CM0 7UF (Maldon District Council) was dismissed on 8 November 2021 by Inspector Warder S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be suitably and sustainably located having regard to development plan and national policies.
the demolition of existing dwelling and erection of 9 dwellings and associated garages, parking areas, gardens, access and amenity areas
- Authority
- Maldon District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Warder S
- Postcode
- CM0 7UF
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be suitably and sustainably located having regard to development plan and national policies
- the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of 18 Southfields with particular regard to outlook
- the effect of the amount of car parking proposed on highway and pedestrian safety
- the effect of the proposal on the protected cedar and horse chestnut trees at the site
- whether the proposal would be likely to have a significant effect, alone or in combination, on Essex Coast Special Protection Areas or, if necessary, provide satisfactory mitigation
What decided it
The significant weight of policy conflict across multiple matters, particularly the oppressive effect on neighbouring living conditions and inadequate parking provision, outweighed the limited contribution to housing supply where the five-year shortfall was only modest.
The need to boost housing supply, particularly where there is a shortfall, carried considerable weight, but the eight additional units proposed would make a limited contribution to the housing supply needs of the District; the adverse impacts of granting permission would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits when assessed against the policies in the Framework as a whole.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy S8Policy S1Policy S2Policy T1Policy T2Policy H4Policy D1Policy N2Policy I1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 79Paragraph 105Paragraph 130Paragraph 103Paragraph 131Paragraph 174Paragraph 179Paragraph 180
- Judgments
- Braintree District Council v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Ors [2017] EWHC 2743
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Maldon
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Allowed8 April 20263373466Land Adjacent to Westerings, Purleigh, Essex, CM3 6PG
- Allowed2 February 20263365410Reddings Farm, Reddings Lane, Tillingham, CM0 7NX
- Dismissed9 January 20263367607The Emporium, 85-87 High Street, Maldon, Essex, CM9 5EP
- Dismissed12 December 202533734041 Mell Road, Tollesbury, Maldon, CM9 8SW
- Allowed8 December 2025337002215 Pump Mead Close, Southminster, CM0 7AE
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®