Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice upheld21 December 20213260809

47 Bideford Avenue, Perivale, Middlesex, UB6 8DE

Planning appeal 3260809 at 47 Bideford Avenue, Perivale, Middlesex, UB6 8DE (London Borough of Ealing) was dismissed on 21 December 2021 by Inspector Savage M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the appeal building provides satisfactory living conditions, having regard to internal space.

continued use of two self-contained flats. Appeal A: S174

Authority
London Borough of Ealing
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Savage M
Postcode
UB6 8DE

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the appeal building provides satisfactory living conditions, having regard to internal space
  • Whether the appeal scheme provides satisfactory amenity space for occupants of the flats
  • The effect of the appeal scheme on the living conditions of the occupants of the appeal property and neighbouring occupants, with particular regard to outlook, privacy and noise and disturbance
  • The effect of the appeal scheme on the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The first floor flat provides insufficient internal floor space (58.85sqm against a minimum requirement of 70-79sqm) and inadequate private amenity space, failing to provide satisfactory living conditions for occupants contrary to the development plan.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 3.5 of the DPDPolicy 7.4 of the DPDPolicy 7D of the DPDPolicy D3 of the London Plan (2021)Policy D6 of the London Plan (2021)Policy 7B of the DPD
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 56

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

290 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Ealing

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Notice upheld4 September 20263365332
    81 Ashness Gardens, Greenford, UB6 0RW
  2. Quashed On Legal Grounds3 September 20263378189
    25 Scorton Avenue, Perivale, UB6 8LA
  3. Notice upheld26 August 20263376041
    Tiramisu Cafe, 12 St. Marys Road, London, W5 5ES
  4. Notice upheld26 August 20263358322
    95 Greatdown Road, London, W7 1JR
  5. Notice upheld24 August 20263367676
    1 Kennedy Road, Hanwell, London, W7 1JL

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.