Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed9 November 20213260863

Galley Hill House, Langham Road, Blakeney, HOLT, NR25 7PR

the subdivision of a dwelling to form two dwellings

Authority
North Norfolk District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Norman R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the site is isolated and therefore whether the exceptions in paragraph 80 of the National Planning Policy Framework should be applied
  • Whether the proposed development would provide suitable access to local services and facilities

What decided it

The subdivision of an existing dwelling falls within the exceptions to the policy against isolated homes in the countryside under paragraph 80 of the Framework, which outweighs the conflict with development plan policies and the limited access to services.

The benefits of allowing subdivision of an existing dwelling in accordance with paragraph 80 of the Framework outweighed the conflict with development plan policies requiring sustainable access to services and the limited public transport options, given the modest traffic generation and the nature of isolated rural properties.

Framework references: 80

Plan policies cited: Policy SS1, Policy SS2, Policy CT 5

Judgments cited: Braintree District Council v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Others [2017] EWHC 2743 Admin; City Country Bramshill Limited v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, Hart District Council, Historic England and The National Trust for Places of Historic Interest or Natural Beauty [2021] EWHC 3437 (Admin)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.