Planning appeal decision
Hangars L6 & L7, White Horse Road, Wroughton Swindon, Wiltshire, SN4 0QZ
Planning appeal 3261411 at Hangars L6 & L7, White Horse Road, Wroughton Swindon, Wiltshire, SN4 0QZ (Swindon Borough Council) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 8 August 2022 by Inspector Dignan P, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the location is suitable for the development, having regard to local and national planning policies.
Without planning permission the construction of: 1) a two storey modular office building as marked 'two storey office block' on the plan at Appendix 2 2) an extension to an existing hangar building L6 as marked 'extension to Hanger L6' on plan at Appendix 2 3) a vehicle weighbridge and ancillary ramp as marked as marked as 'vehicle weighbridge' on the plan at Appendix 2 4) a HGV fuelling area and the ancillary slot drain and fuel/oil separator as marked 'Refuelling area' on the plan at Appendix 2 5) a three brush automated vehicle washing unit and water tank, marked as 'vehicle wash down area' on the plan at Appendix 2 6) areas of hardstanding as marked 'hardstanding' on the plan at Appendix 2 7) areas laid to loose aggregate stone as detailed ‘aggregate stone’ on the plan at Appendix 2
- Authority
- Swindon Borough Council
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- employment-industrial · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Dignan P
- Postcode
- SN4 0QZ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the location is suitable for the development, having regard to local and national planning policies
- The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the North Wessex Downs Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB)
- Whether there are likely to be adverse impacts on highway safety and functioning
What decided it
The combined harm to the AONB's landscape character and tranquillity and to highway safety on the surrounding rural road network and byway outweighed the economic and land re-use benefits, resulting in conflict with the development plan as a whole.
The economic benefits and re-use of previously developed land were outweighed by the harm to the AONB's character and tranquillity and to highway safety, so the development conflicted with the development plan as a whole and permission was refused.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SD2Policy EC4Policy TR2Policy EN5
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 85
- Judgments
- Cardiff Rating Authority v Guest Keen Baldwin Iron and Steel Co Ltd [1949] 1 KB 385; Skerritts of Nottingham Ltd v SSETR (No.2) [2000] EWCA Civ 5569
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Swindon
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Dismissed28 May 20243336985269 Cricklade Road, Swindon, SN2 1AG
- Planning permission granted2 February 2024332934483 Upham Road, Swindon, SN3 1DL
- Notice upheld1 September 20233295441Farm Buildings at Eastrop Farm, Shrivenham Road, Highworth, Swindon, SN6 7QQ
- Quashed On Legal Grounds8 February 20223280902Farm Buildings at Eastrop Farm, Highworth, Swindon, SN6 7QQ
- Dismissed28 July 2026600907844 The Parade, Swindon, SN1 1BA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®