Planning appeal decision
Woodham Nursery, Eastbourne Road, South Godstone, Godstone, RH9 8JB
Planning appeal 3262108 at Woodham Nursery, Eastbourne Road, South Godstone, Godstone, RH9 8JB (Tandridge District Council) was dismissed on 6 August 2021 by Inspector Roberts G, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and development plan policy.
demolition of glasshouse and some other structures. Erection of detached bungalow (outline planning for access and layout)
- Authority
- Tandridge District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Roberts G
- Postcode
- RH9 8JB
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and development plan policy
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, the living conditions of future occupiers and the compliance with local and national policies on flood planning
- If the proposal is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development
What decided it
The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt by reason of greater impact on openness than existing development, and the moderate harm to the Green Belt is not clearly outweighed by other considerations, particularly as the proposal is for market housing with limited benefits.
The moderate harm to the Green Belt and other harms to character, living conditions and flood risk were not outweighed by the limited benefits of one residential unit and short-term economic benefits from construction, particularly as the proposal is for market housing without affordable housing contribution.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DP10Policy DP13Policy DP7Policy DP21Policy CSP18Policy CSP21
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 137Paragraph 147Paragraph 148Paragraph 149Paragraph 159Paragraph 160Paragraph 161Paragraph 162Paragraph 163Paragraph 164Paragraph 165Paragraph 166Paragraph 167Paragraph 168Paragraph 169
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Tandridge District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Allowed29 October 20266006369Land at Thornhill, Westerham Road, Limpsfield, Oxted, RH8 0ED
- Dismissed14 October 20266008351Development Site West of Southwood, Waller Lane, Caterham, CR3 5EA
- Dismissed13 October 20266007518Rosemary Cottage, Smallfield Road, Horne, Horley, RH6 9JP
- Dismissed23 September 20266008688Land Adjacent to Farm View Cottage, Lingfield Road, East Grinstead, RH19 2JW
- Dismissed22 September 20266011736Land Adjacent to Oaklands Drive, Copthorne Bank, Copthorne, RH10 3JD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®