Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed14 September 20213262188

Land between Pinders Croft and The Chapel, High Street, Walkeringham, Doncaster, DN10 4LW

the construction of 9 dwellings on land with outline permission for residential development granted under APP/A3010/W/17/3184900

Authority
Bassetlaw District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Radcliffe I

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the location of the proposed development would be in accordance with the development plan
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether the proposal would deliver a range of housing types and sizes that directly reflect housing needs

What decided it

The proposal conflicts with the development plan taken as a whole, particularly the recently made Neighbourhood Plan which allocates sites to meet the village's growth needs and defines a revised development boundary that excludes the appeal site, and there are no material considerations including the Framework provisions that outweigh this conflict.

The social and economic benefits of the scheme, including housing supply and economic activity, were outweighed by the material harm to character and appearance, the conflict with the spatial strategy of the development plan, and the failure to deliver an appropriate housing mix, in circumstances where the Neighbourhood Plan has allocated sites and identified potential for windfall infill to meet the village's growth targets.

Framework references: 219, 79, 11

Plan policies cited: CS8, DM4, DM8, Policy 1, Policy 2, Policy 3, Policy 4

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.