Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed6 September 20233262495

Land Between James Anderson Court and 199 Kingsland Road, London, E2 8BE

Planning appeal 3262495 at Land Between James Anderson Court and 199 Kingsland Road, London, E2 8BE (London Borough of Hackney) was dismissed on 6 September 2023 by Inspector Rafiq F, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, including in respect of trees and whether it would preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the Kingsland Conservation Area.

the construction of a part four-storey, part two storey and part one storey building containing three residential units

Authority
London Borough of Hackney
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Rafiq F
Postcode
E2 8AN

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, including in respect of trees and whether it would preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the Kingsland Conservation Area
  • Whether the proposed development would provide satisfactory conditions for future occupiers with regard to internal space, outlook, privacy and light

What decided it

The proposal would fail to preserve the character and appearance of the conservation area and would not provide satisfactory living conditions for future occupiers in terms of internal space and privacy.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy LP1Policy LP3Policy LP2Policy LP17Policy LP14
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 130Paragraph 189

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

At least 812 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Hackney

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed2 October 20266007927
    47 Burma Road, Hackney, N16 9BH
  2. Dismissed1 October 20266010033
    259 Wick Road, Hackney, London, E9 5DG
  3. Dismissed30 September 20266010111
    Flat B, 83 Rectory Road, Hackney, N16 7PP
  4. Dismissed30 September 20266010110
    Flat B, 83 Rectory Road, Hackney, N16 7PP
  5. Dismissed25 September 20266012204
    42 Cranwich Road, Hackney, N16 5JN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.