Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed19 August 20213262745

Land Opp. Arnos Grove Station, Bowes Road, London, N11 1BA

Planning appeal 3262745 at Land Opp. Arnos Grove Station, Bowes Road, London, N11 1BA (London Borough of Enfield) was dismissed on 19 August 2021 by Inspector Thompson P, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the street scene, including the setting of the Grade II* listed building, known as Arnos Grove Underground Station, and the visual amenity of an adjacent street tree.

telecommunications installation: Proposed 18m Phase 8 Monopole C/W wrapround Cabinet at base and associated ancillary works

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Other minor developments
Inspector
Thompson P
Postcode
N11 1BA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the street scene, including the setting of the Grade II* listed building, known as Arnos Grove Underground Station, and the visual amenity of an adjacent street tree

What decided it

The significant harm caused by the height, profile and appearance of the proposal and its overall visual prominence to the setting of the Grade II* listed building outweighed the considerable public benefits of improved telecommunications connectivity.

The considerable public benefits of improved 5G connectivity and economic and social benefits were balanced against the significant harm to the setting of the Grade II* listed building, with the balance tipping against the proposal because the harm was determinative and the public benefits did not outweigh the great weight to be given to the less than substantial harm.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
DMD37DMD38DMD44DMD80DMD81Core Policy 30Core Policy 31Core Policy 36Policy D4Policy G7Policy GG1Policy GG2Policy GG3Policy GG5Policy GG6Policy HC1Policy HC3Policy T2
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 197Paragraph 199Paragraph 202

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

543 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Enfield

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed7 November 20243339494
    O/S 244 Fore Street, London, N18 2QD
  2. Dismissed7 November 20243339491
    O/S 244 Fore Street, London, N18 2QD
  3. Allowed25 January 20233298867
    Area of Footpath Located off, Chequers Way, London, N13 6DA
  4. Dismissed17 August 20223280481
    Area of Footpath, Junction of London and Lincoln Roads, Southbury, Enfield, EN2 6EW
  5. Dismissed13 July 20223290597
    Stone Hall (Fpa), Houndsden Road, Winchmore Hill, London, N21 1LP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.