Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed7 July 20213262936

Riverdale, Old Mill Lane, Uxbridge, UB8 2JH

Planning appeal 3262936 at Riverdale, Old Mill Lane, Uxbridge, UB8 2JH (London Borough of Hillingdon) was dismissed on 7 July 2021 by Inspector Pipkin R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.

one single storey barn of area of 288 square metres

Authority
London Borough of Hillingdon
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
agricultural · Minor general industry/storage/warehousing
Inspector
Pipkin R
Postcode
UB8 2JH

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, including the riverside setting
  • the effect of the proposed development on heritage assets
  • the effect of the proposed development on flooding
  • the effect of the proposed development on protected species
  • if the proposal is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, and if so, would this amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt causing substantial harm to openness and significant harm to character, appearance and heritage assets, with no very special circumstances demonstrated to justify it.

The substantial harm from inappropriateness and significant harm to openness, character, appearance and heritage significance, together with unresolved flood risk and ecology concerns, were not outweighed by the very limited private benefit of storage provision, and no very special circumstances were established.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy G2 of the London Plan 2021Policy HC1 of the London Plan 2021Policy SI12 of the London Plan 2021Policy SI14 of the London Plan 2021Policy EM2 of the Hillingdon Local Plan Part 1 – Strategic Policies 2012Policy BE1 of the Hillingdon Local Plan Part 1 – Strategic Policies 2012Policy HE1 of the Hillingdon Local Plan Part 1 – Strategic Policies 2012Policy EM6 of the Hillingdon Local Plan Part 1 – Strategic Policies 2012Policy DMEI 4 of the Hillingdon Local Plan Part 2 – Development Management Policies 2020Policy DMEI 7 of the Hillingdon Local Plan Part 2 – Development Management Policies 2020Policy DMEI 8 of the Hillingdon Local Plan Part 2 – Development Management Policies 2020Policy DMEI 9 of the Hillingdon Local Plan Part 2 – Development Management Policies 2020Policy DMHB 1 of the Hillingdon Local Plan Part 2 – Development Management Policies 2020Policy DMHB 2 of the Hillingdon Local Plan Part 2 – Development Management Policies 2020Policy DMHB 4 of the Hillingdon Local Plan Part 2 – Development Management Policies 2020Policy DMHB 11 of the Hillingdon Local Plan Part 2 – Development Management Policies 2020Policy DMHB 12 of the Hillingdon Local Plan Part 2 – Development Management Policies 2020
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 133Paragraph 143Paragraph 144Paragraph 145Paragraph 163Paragraph 196Paragraph 99

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

186 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Hillingdon

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed15 September 20266010520
    Grove Farm, Rickmansworth Road, Harefield, UB9 6JY
  2. Notice varied and upheld29 July 20253363007
    Land on the West Side of High Street, Harlington, Hayes, UB3 5DW
  3. Dismissed20 June 20253355798
    Khayri House, 70 Clifton Gardens, Uxbridge, Hillingdon, UB10 0EZ
  4. Allowed21 February 20253341154
    Chandigrah Summerhouse Lane, Harefield, Uxbridge, UB9 6HS
  5. Dismissed1 November 20243345366
    Grass Verge Adjacent To 19 Rutters Close, West Drayton, UB7 9AL

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.