Planning appeal decision
Ocean Fresh, 3 Greyhound Road, London, W6 8NH
Planning appeal 3263082 at Ocean Fresh, 3 Greyhound Road, London, W6 8NH (London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham) was dismissed on 17 June 2021 by Inspector Scott A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect on the living conditions of future occupiers of the flats.
Change of use of No. 3 (takeaway with ancillary restaurant Use Class A3/A5) and No.5 (Use class A1 retail) at ground floor and basement levels into a single unit (takeaway with ancillary restaurant Use Class A5/A3) to the front and residential (Class C3) to the rear, including the installation of new shopfronts; erection of 2x extraction ducts to rear elevation to replace existing ducts; erection of part single storey, part four storey and part five storey rear extensions at basement to third floor levels following demolition of the existing back additions of both No. 3 and 5 to provide 3x one bedroom and 6x studio self-contained residential flats at basement, ground, first, second and third floor levels of unit 3, and basement, ground and first floor level of unit 5
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Change of use
- Inspector
- Scott A
- Postcode
- W6 8NH
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect on the living conditions of future occupiers of the flats
- Whether or not there would be adequate on-site cycle parking
- The effect on flood risk and water use
What decided it
The poor quality of residential accommodation proposed, combined with inadequate cycle parking provision and unresolved flood risk concerns, meant the proposal failed to accord with the development plan taken as a whole.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy HO4Policy HO11Policy T3Appendix 8Policy CC3Key Principle HS3
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 55
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Dismissed21 August 2026601016715 Galena Road, London, W6 0LT
- Dismissed21 August 2026601016313 Galena Road, London, W6 0LT
- Dismissed21 August 20266009772Pavement Outside 297 King Street, Hammersmith, W6 9NH
- Dismissed13 July 20266008335Land To Rear Of 120 Goldhawk Road, London, W12 8HD
- Dismissed15 June 20266006413110-112 Uxbridge Road, London, W12 8LR
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®