Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed15 June 20266006413

110-112 Uxbridge Road, London, W12 8LR

Planning appeal 6006413 at 110-112 Uxbridge Road, London, W12 8LR (London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham) was dismissed on 15 June 2026 by Inspector K Dryden, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be acceptable with regard to the loss of employment floorspace over the upper floors of the property, with particular regard to marketing evidence.

conversion of the upper floors and change of use from offices (Class E) to provide 4 x 1 bedroom self-contained flats (Class C3), and conversion of part of ground floor from commercial to ancillary residential use to provide refuse and cycle storage

Appeal type
Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Inspector
K Dryden
Postcode
W12 8LR

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be acceptable with regard to the loss of employment floorspace over the upper floors of the property, with particular regard to marketing evidence
  • whether the proposal provides adequate living conditions for future occupiers with particular regard to space standards and fire safety
  • the effect of the development on the availability of on street car parking in the area and the provision of bicycle storage

What decided it

The absence of substantive marketing evidence to justify the loss of valuable employment floorspace in a town centre location, combined with inadequate information to assess living conditions for future occupiers and unmitigated parking pressures on the surrounding highway network.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy E2Policy D12Policy D6Policy HO11Policy DC1Policy T4Policy T5Policy T3

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

At least 815 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed21 August 20266010167
    15 Galena Road, London, W6 0LT
  2. Dismissed21 August 20266010163
    13 Galena Road, London, W6 0LT
  3. Dismissed21 August 20266009772
    Pavement Outside 297 King Street, Hammersmith, W6 9NH
  4. Allowed7 May 20266004923
    205 Munster Road, London, SW6 6BX
  5. Dismissed18 February 20263374185
    Schoolkeepers House, 285 Munster Road, London, SW6 6BW

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.