Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed18 February 20263374185

Schoolkeepers House, 285 Munster Road, London, SW6 6BW

Planning appeal 3374185 at Schoolkeepers House, 285 Munster Road, London, SW6 6BW (London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham) was dismissed on 18 February 2026 by Inspector Owen A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the obligation is reasonable and necessary in the interests of promoting sustainable modes of transport and protecting air quality.

Change of use from school caretaker's house (Class F1(a)) to single family dwellinghouse (Class C3); erection of brick boundary walls with cladding to replace existing chain link fencing

Appeal type
other · Section 106 Agreement
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Owen A
Postcode
SW6 6BW

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the obligation is reasonable and necessary in the interests of promoting sustainable modes of transport and protecting air quality

What decided it

The obligation to prevent occupiers from obtaining parking permits is directly related to the development, necessary to encourage sustainable transport and protect air quality in accordance with the development plan, and therefore accords with Regulation 122 of the CIL Regulations.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
London Plan (2021) policy T6London Plan (2021) policy T4Hammersmith & Fulham Local Plan (2018) policy T4Hammersmith & Fulham Local Plan (2018) policy T1Hammersmith & Fulham Local Plan (2018) policy CC10Planning Guidance Supplementary Planning Document (2016) principle TR3

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

At least 820 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed21 August 20266010167
    15 Galena Road, London, W6 0LT
  2. Dismissed21 August 20266010163
    13 Galena Road, London, W6 0LT
  3. Dismissed21 August 20266009772
    Pavement Outside 297 King Street, Hammersmith, W6 9NH
  4. Dismissed15 June 20266006413
    110-112 Uxbridge Road, London, W12 8LR
  5. Allowed7 May 20266004923
    205 Munster Road, London, SW6 6BX

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.