Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed18 August 20213263394

Land adjacent to Moonstone, Chilton Street, Clare, Suffolk, CO10 8QS

erection of paragraph 79 dwelling with associated landscaping

Authority
West Suffolk
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Seddon M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • effect on biodiversity
  • effect on trees

What decided it

The proposed dwelling would not be of the exceptional quality required by paragraph 80 of the NPPF, as it would be a prominent dominant feature in the countryside that would not significantly enhance its immediate setting or be sensitive to the defining characteristics of the rural area.

Framework references: 80, 134, 70

Plan policies cited: Core Strategy policy CS1, Core Strategy policy CS4, Local Plan JDMPD policy DM5, Local Plan JDMPD policy DM27, Core Strategy policy CS3, Local Plan JDMPD policy DM2, Local Plan JDMPD policy DM13, Local Plan JDMPD policy DM22

Judgments cited: Braintree District Council v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Ors [2018] EWCA Civ 610

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.