Planning appeal decision
Former Tavistock and Summerhill School, Summerhill Lane, Lindfield, RH16 1RP
Planning appeal 3263492 at Former Tavistock and Summerhill School, Summerhill Lane, Lindfield, RH16 1RP (Mid Sussex District Council) was dismissed on 4 October 2021 by Inspector Gilbert J, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The main issue in this appeal is the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.
erection of 38 residential dwellings comprising 4 houses and 34 flats with associated internal access, surface-level car parking, landscaping and other infrastructure
- Authority
- Mid Sussex District Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Gilbert J
- Postcode
- RH16 1RP
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The main issue in this appeal is the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.
What decided it
The negative effect of the proposed development's layout, massing, design and proportions on the character and appearance of the Summerhill Lane/West Common Area of Townscape Character.
The benefits of the proposal, including affordable housing provision, sustainable location and optimisation of a brownfield site, were outweighed by the harm to the character and appearance of the area, so the adverse impacts outweighed the benefits.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- MSDP Policy DP26LLRNP Policy 7LLRNP Policies 1 and 2MSDP Policy DP31MSDP Policy DP20
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 69Paragraph 130Paragraph 172
- Judgments
- Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment [JPL 1982]; Holborn Studios Ltd v London Borough of Hackney [EWHC 2823 (Admin)]
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Mid Sussex
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Allowed29 October 202660151205, Dexter Drive, East Grinstead, RH19 4SU
- Dismissed22 October 2026601278111 Barnfield, Balcombe, RH17 6FW
- Dismissed9 October 20266010262Development Site At Former Tower Car Sales, Tower Close, East Grinstead, RH19 3BY
- Dismissed9 October 20266005209Lullings Cottage, West Hill, Ardingly, RH17 6QY
- Dismissed9 October 20266005206Lullings Cottage, West Hill, Ardingly, RH17 6QY
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®