Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed4 October 20213263492

Former Tavistock and Summerhill School, Summerhill Lane, Lindfield, RH16 1RP

erection of 38 residential dwellings comprising 4 houses and 34 flats with associated internal access, surface-level car parking, landscaping and other infrastructure

Authority
Mid Sussex District Council
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Gilbert J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The main issue in this appeal is the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.

What decided it

The negative effect of the proposed development's layout, massing, design and proportions on the character and appearance of the Summerhill Lane/West Common Area of Townscape Character.

The benefits of the proposal, including affordable housing provision, sustainable location and optimisation of a brownfield site, were outweighed by the harm to the character and appearance of the area, so the adverse impacts outweighed the benefits.

Framework references: 69, 130, 172

Plan policies cited: MSDP Policy DP26, LLRNP Policy 7, LLRNP Policies 1 and 2, MSDP Policy DP31, MSDP Policy DP20

Judgments cited: Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment [JPL 1982]; Holborn Studios Ltd v London Borough of Hackney [EWHC 2823 (Admin)]

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.