Planning appeal decision
Highcombe, Long Hill, Woldingham, Caterham, CR3 7EP
Planning appeal 3263768 at Highcombe, Long Hill, Woldingham, Caterham, CR3 7EP (Tandridge District Council) was dismissed on 26 October 2021 by Inspector Chandler M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on trees.
The proposed scheme is for the demolition of the existing house and detached garage. Erection of two detached houses with attached garages, pool building and secured bin stores
- Authority
- Tandridge District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Chandler M
- Postcode
- CR3 7EP
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposal on trees
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
- the effect of the proposal on local biodiversity
- whether the proposal would make suitable provision for renewable energy technologies, having regard to the requirements of local policy
What decided it
The substantial and demonstrably harmful effect on important protected trees on the site, combined with harm to character and appearance and failure to address biodiversity concerns, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the limited benefits of housing delivery and economic contribution.
The limited benefits of housing supply, economic activity and quick build-out were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the substantial harms to important trees, character and appearance, and biodiversity protection, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DP7Policy CSP18Policy CSP19Policy DP8Policy L1Policy L2Policy CSP17Policy DP19Policy CSP14
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 180
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Tandridge District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Allowed29 October 20266006369Land at Thornhill, Westerham Road, Limpsfield, Oxted, RH8 0ED
- Dismissed26 October 2026601413931a Banstead Road, Caterham, CR3 5QH
- Dismissed15 October 20266005184Streathbourne House, 75 Redehall Road, Smallfield, RH6 9QA
- Dismissed14 October 20266008351Development Site West of Southwood, Waller Lane, Caterham, CR3 5EA
- Dismissed13 October 20266007518Rosemary Cottage, Smallfield Road, Horne, Horley, RH6 9JP
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®