Planning appeal decision
Junction of Rayleigh Road and Whitehouse Road, Eastwood, Southend, Essex, SS9 5SB
Planning appeal 3264029 at Junction of Rayleigh Road and Whitehouse Road, Eastwood, Southend, Essex, SS9 5SB (Southend-on-Sea City Council) was dismissed on 14 October 2021 by Inspector Smith D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the character and appearance of the area.
the installation of a new 20 metre high monopole supporting 6 no. antennas with a wrap around equipment cabinet at the base of the column, the installation of 3 no. new equipment cabinets, and ancillary development thereto
- Authority
- Southend-on-Sea City Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- telecoms · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Smith D
- Postcode
- SS9 5SB
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the character and appearance of the area
- Whether any harm would be outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed taking into account any suitable alternatives
What decided it
The significant harm to the character and appearance of a locally important green space caused by the height, position and design of the monopole outweighed the social and economic benefits of 5G infrastructure delivery.
The social and economic benefits of 5G infrastructure were significant but did not outweigh the significant harm to the character and appearance of the surrounding area, particularly the locally important green space.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Core StrategyDevelopment Management Document
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 81Paragraph 117
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Southend-on-Sea City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Dismissed29 October 202660131273 Cobham Road,, Westcliff-on-Sea,, SS0 8EG
- Dismissed27 October 2026601125920 Tattersall Gardens, Leigh on Sea, Southend on Sea, SS92QT
- Dismissed2 October 20266009318128 Monometer House Rectory Grove, Leigh-on-sea, Southend-on-sea, SS9 2HN
- Dismissed2 October 20266009119456 Southchurch Rd, Southend, SS1 2QA
- Dismissed30 September 20266008855Shorefield Cottage 7A, Shorefield Road, Westcliff-on-Sea, SS07RH
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®