Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld6 December 20213264074

Land at Goodacre Farm Lawn Lane, Coven, Wolverhampton, WV9 5BA

Planning appeal 3264074 at Land at Goodacre Farm Lawn Lane, Coven, Wolverhampton, WV9 5BA (South Staffordshire District Council) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 6 December 2021 by Inspector Shields T, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the enforcement notice is a nullity or invalid.

without planning permission, the making of a material change of use of Land, to Land used for storage purposes including the parking and storage of commercial vehicles, commercial trailers including commercial box trailers, curtain side trailers and porta cabins together with waste materials on the Land outlined in red for identification purposes on the plan attached to this Notice

Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
employment-industrial · Minor general industry/storage/warehousing
Inspector
Shields T
Postcode
WV9 5BA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the enforcement notice is a nullity or invalid
  • Whether copies of the enforcement notice were properly served
  • Whether the matters alleged constitute a breach of planning control
  • Whether the breach is immune from enforcement action due to passage of time
  • Whether the requirements of the notice exceed what is necessary to remedy the breach
  • Whether the period for compliance is reasonable

What decided it

The appellant failed to demonstrate on the balance of probability that the commercial storage use had been carried out continuously for 10 years prior to the enforcement notice being issued, with photographic evidence and local resident testimony indicating the land was primarily agricultural before 2019.

What the Inspector cited

Judgments
Oates v SoCLG and Canterbury [2017] EWHC 27166; Oates v SSCLG [2018] EWCA civ 2229; Miller Mead v MHLG [1963] 1 A11 ER 459; Westminster CC v SSE & Aboro [1983] JPL 602; Ferris v SSE [1998] JPL 777

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

24 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in South Staffordshire District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed21 October 20266012641
    The Granary, Lyne Hill Lane, Penkridge, ST19 5NT
  2. Allowed25 September 20266010537
    Land to the Rear of 6-12 Long Lane, Newtown, Wolverhampton, WS6 6AU
  3. Dismissed23 September 20266008866
    The Paddocks, Bridgnorth Road, Stourton, DY7 6QZ
  4. Dismissed12 August 20266010048
    Hilton Colliery Farm Cottage, Red Lane, Essington, WV11 2RD
  5. Dismissed15 July 20266007394
    White Lodge, Old Stafford Road, Slade Heath, WV10 7PH

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.