Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice upheld16 August 20213264591

Pondwood Farm, Pondwood Lane, White Waltham, MAIDENHEAD, SL6 3SS

Without planning permission, the erection of an outbuilding for separate residential use (in the approximate position as hatched in green on the attached plan)

Authority
Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Hand S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the matters alleged in the enforcement notice have occurred
  • Whether the development as alleged requires planning permission
  • Whether there is a fallback position
  • Whether the period for compliance is reasonable

What decided it

The outbuilding is a substantial self-contained 4-bedroom house occupied independently by a separate family with no functional or physical link to the main house, constituting a material change of use to a separate dwelling requiring planning permission.

Judgments cited: Gravesham BC v SSE & O'Brien [1982] 47 P&CR 142; Uttlesford DC v SSE & White [1992] JPL 171

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.