Planning appeal decision
The Armoury at Oasthouse Cottage, Gun Hill, Chiddingly, East Sussex, TN21 0JU
Planning appeal 3265024 at The Armoury at Oasthouse Cottage, Gun Hill, Chiddingly, East Sussex, TN21 0JU (Wealden District Council) was dismissed on 7 October 2021 by Inspector Steen A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the dwelling is in a suitable location in respect of its relationship to nearby settlements.
without planning permission, change of use of the building shown coloured red on the attached plan ('the Armoury') from use a granny annexe to use as a separate dwellinghouse
- Authority
- Wealden District Council
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Change of use
- Inspector
- Steen A
- Postcode
- TN21 0JU
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the dwelling is in a suitable location in respect of its relationship to nearby settlements
- the effect of the dwelling on the intrinsic character and beauty of the landscape
- whether the use of the Armoury as a separate dwelling affects the setting of the listed buildings at Gun Cottage, Farthing Cottage and Gatehouse Farmhouse
What decided it
The less than substantial harm to the setting of listed buildings, combined with the isolated location and landscape harm, provided a clear reason for refusal under paragraph 11d)1 of the Framework that outweighed the minimal public benefit of one additional dwelling.
the minimal public benefit of adding a single dwelling to housing supply was outweighed by the less than substantial harm to the setting of listed buildings and the conflicts with development plan policies on isolated dwellings and landscape protection
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy GD2Policy SPO1Policy SPO13Policy EN8Policy EN27Policy DC8Policy DC17Policy DC19Policy WCS14
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 194Paragraph 195Paragraph 196Paragraph 197Paragraph 198Paragraph 199Paragraph 200Paragraph 202
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Wealden District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Notice varied and upheld28 September 20263356589Land An New House Farm, Buckham Hill, Isfield, East Sussex, TN22 5XU
- Quashed15 September 20266006632Land at Five Oaks, Lewes Road, Laughton, BN8 6BJ
- decided15 September 20266006631Land at Five Oaks, Lewes Road, Laughton, BN8 6BJ
- Notice upheld22 May 20263358235Wyck Stable, Wyck Lane, Woods Green, Wadhurst, East Sussex, TN5 6QS
- Notice varied and upheld29 April 20263327860The Dinglewood Brittenden Lane, Waldron, Heathfield, TN21 0RN
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®