Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Split Decision11 March 20223265300

52 Sinclair Grove, LONDON, NW11 9JG

Without planning permission, the construction of a single storey rear extension to a pre-existing extension and the construction of a first floor rear extension on top of the existing development (as shown edged red)

Authority
London Borough of Barnet
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Renaudon L

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the property and the area, with the Council's reason stating that the development is considered to lack a subordinate relationship with the host dwelling, is overly dominant when viewed from the rear garden, and amounts to an over development of the property
  • The effect of the development on the neighbouring living conditions, citing impacts on the neighbour's outlook and sense of enclosure as a result of the dimensions of the development

What decided it

The excessive height of the ground floor extension resulting from declining land levels created unacceptable impacts on neighbouring living conditions through enclosure and loss of outlook, whereas the first floor extension could be made acceptable through conditions requiring matching materials.

Plan policies cited: CS NPPF, CS1, DM01, D6, CS5, DM02

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.