Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Split Decision21 February 20223265333

Plots 4, 4A, 5, 5A Hepworth Drive, Swallownest, Sheffield, S26 4RS

Planning appeal 3265333 at Plots 4, 4A, 5, 5A Hepworth Drive, Swallownest, Sheffield, S26 4RS (Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 21 February 2022 by Inspector Merrett R, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the development on the living conditions of neighbouring residents with particular regard to i) privacy of the rear garden area of No 20 Hepworth Drive; ii) outlook in relation to the rear of No 8 Doctors Row and iii) outlook in relation to the rear of properties situated on Shaldon Grove.

Erection of a pair of semi-detached houses and two detached houses (Plots 4, 4A, 5 and 5A)

Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Merrett R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on the living conditions of neighbouring residents with particular regard to i) privacy of the rear garden area of No 20 Hepworth Drive; ii) outlook in relation to the rear of No 8 Doctors Row and iii) outlook in relation to the rear of properties situated on Shaldon Grove

What decided it

The overbearing effect of the Plot 5 dwelling on the outlook and living conditions of No 8 Doctors Row

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SP 55 of the Rotherham Local Plan (Sites and Policies) 2018
Judgments
Tapecrown Ltd v FSS & the Vale of White Horse DC [2006] EWCA Civ 1744; Bhandal v SSHCLG & Bromsgrove DC [2020] EWHC 2724 (Admin)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

29 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Rotherham

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Notice varied and upheld5 August 20263375108
    Land at the Rear of 19 Shelley Road, Herringthorpe, Rotherham, S65 2NF
  2. Dismissed3 August 20266009594
    179, Worksop Road, Rotherham, S26 4WB
  3. Notice upheld12 June 20263373896
    Stevenage, West Lane, Aughton, Rotherham, S26 3XS
  4. Dismissed1 June 20263356492
    The Barn, The Stables, Common Road, Thorpe Saalvin, Rotherham, S80 3JJ
  5. Allowed1 June 20263353129
    The Stables, Common Road, Thorpe Salvin, Rotherham, S80 3JJ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.