Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed4 October 20213265428

29-31 Shepiston Lane, Hayes, London, UB3 1LJ

Planning appeal 3265428 at 29-31 Shepiston Lane, Hayes, London, UB3 1LJ (London Borough of Hillingdon) was allowed on 4 October 2021 by Inspector Buchanan R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.

demolition of existing buildings and erection of a 3 storey plus basement 97 bedroom hotel (Use Class C1), together with soft and hard landscaping, servicing, cycle storage, car parking and refuse and recycling facilities

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
leisure-sport · Other Major Developments
Inspector
Buchanan R
Postcode
UB3 1LJ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • the living conditions of the existing occupiers of nearby dwellings with regard to privacy and noise and general disturbance
  • highway safety with regard to egress from the site

What decided it

The significant social, economic and environmental benefits arising from the construction and operation of the hotel, including provision of additional tourist accommodation, employment and training opportunities, effective use of previously developed land, high quality design, and infrastructure improvements secured through the unilateral undertaking, outweighed the material increase in built form when considered against the absence of harm to the identified main issues subject to conditions.

The material increase in built form and intensification of use would cause no harm to character and appearance, living conditions or highway safety subject to conditions and the unilateral undertaking, and the significant social, economic and environmental benefits of the hotel development, including tourism provision, employment, investment, design quality and infrastructure improvements, were given substantial weight in favour of the proposal.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy BE1Policy DMHB11Policy DMHB12Policy DMHB14Policy DME5Policy DMT1Policy DMT2Policy DMCI7London Plan Policy D4London Plan Policy D5London Plan Policy D6London Plan Policy DF1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 56Paragraph 57

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

264 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Hillingdon

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266009856
    18-20 Wilmar Close, Hayes, UB4 8ET
  2. Dismissed18 September 20266011516
    73 High Street, Ruislip, HA4 8JB
  3. Dismissed15 September 20266010520
    Grove Farm, Rickmansworth Road, Harefield, UB9 6JY
  4. Dismissed7 August 20266005469
    10 Lawn Avenue, West Drayton, UB7 7AQ
  5. Dismissed23 July 20266008246
    21 Green Lane, Hillingdon, Uxbridge, UB8 3ED

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.