Planning appeal decision
738-742 High Road, London, N12 9QD
Planning appeal 3265467 at 738-742 High Road, London, N12 9QD (London Borough of Barnet) was dismissed on 18 March 2022 by Inspector Coyne C, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of its future occupiers and on those of the neighbouring occupiers of no. 744 High Road having regard to privacy.
described on the application form as ‘Demolition of the existing building and the erection of a new mixed-use development with a commercial ground floor/basement unit and 19no. self-contained flats arranged over 5 storeys, along with a roof terrace communal amenity area and car parking arranged over the basement
- Authority
- London Borough of Barnet
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Coyne C
- Postcode
- N12 9QD
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of its future occupiers and on those of the neighbouring occupiers of no. 744 High Road having regard to privacy
- the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of its future occupiers having regard to daylight and sunlight
- the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the future occupiers of unit nos. 12 and 17 having regard to outlook
- whether it would be economically viable for the proposal to provide affordable housing in accordance with the relevant policies of the adopted development plan for the area
What decided it
The cumulative material harm to living conditions from loss of privacy, inadequate daylight/sunlight and poor outlook outweighed the viability-based justification for providing no affordable housing.
The economic viability of providing no affordable housing, supported by an executed Unilateral Undertaking with review mechanisms, was not of sufficient weight to outweigh the material harm identified to living conditions, so the adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DM01Policy D3Policy D6Policy CS4Policy DM10
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Barnet
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Notice varied and upheld29 September 2026335964435 Hillview Gardens, London, NW4 2JJ
- Allowed10 September 2026600040541 Brent Park Road, London, NW4 3HN
- Notice upheld28 August 2026336160153 Essex Park, London, N3 1ND
- Notice varied and upheld27 August 2026336134827 Dale Grove, London, N12 8EE
- Notice upheld26 August 2026337608848 Oldberry Road, Edgware, HA8 9DB
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®