Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed18 March 20223265467

738-742 High Road, LONDON, N12 9QD

described on the application form as ‘Demolition of the existing building and the erection of a new mixed-use development with a commercial ground floor/basement unit and 19no. self-contained flats arranged over 5 storeys, along with a roof terrace communal amenity area and car parking arranged over the basement

Authority
London Borough of Barnet
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Coyne C

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of its future occupiers and on those of the neighbouring occupiers of no. 744 High Road having regard to privacy
  • the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of its future occupiers having regard to daylight and sunlight
  • the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the future occupiers of unit nos. 12 and 17 having regard to outlook
  • whether it would be economically viable for the proposal to provide affordable housing in accordance with the relevant policies of the adopted development plan for the area

What decided it

The cumulative material harm to living conditions from loss of privacy, inadequate daylight/sunlight and poor outlook outweighed the viability-based justification for providing no affordable housing.

The economic viability of providing no affordable housing, supported by an executed Unilateral Undertaking with review mechanisms, was not of sufficient weight to outweigh the material harm identified to living conditions, so the adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits.

Plan policies cited: Policy DM01, Policy D3, Policy D6, Policy CS4, Policy DM10

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.