Planning appeal decision
16-18 Southview Road, Warlingham, CR6 9JE
Planning appeal 3265603 at 16-18 Southview Road, Warlingham, CR6 9JE (Tandridge District Council) was dismissed on 22 October 2021 by Inspector Ayres J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area having regard to protected trees.
demolition of existing houses, nos. 16 & 18 Southview Road and the erection of two blocks of 14 units comprising 7x3 beds and 7x2 beds with shared under croft car park and street entry level to accommodate 21 spaces with an additional 3 off-street parking and extra 4 spaces within property boundary
- Authority
- Tandridge District Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Ayres J
- Postcode
- CR6 9JE
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area having regard to protected trees
- whether the proposal would provide adequate living conditions for future occupiers
- the effect of the proposal on ecology
What decided it
The significant harm to the character and appearance of the area caused by the scale and mass of the development dominating the leafy, sylvan street scene, combined with inadequate living conditions for future occupiers and unresolved ecology concerns, substantially and demonstrably outweighed the modest housing delivery benefits.
The benefits of housing delivery and social and economic benefits of the scheme were outweighed by the significant harm to character and appearance, failure to provide adequate living conditions, and ecology concerns; the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DP7Policy DP8Policy CSP18Policy CSP17Policy DP19
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 71Paragraph 124Paragraph 126Paragraph 130Paragraph 174Paragraph 180
- Judgments
- Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v SSE [JPL 1982 P37]
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Tandridge District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Allowed29 October 20266006369Land at Thornhill, Westerham Road, Limpsfield, Oxted, RH8 0ED
- Dismissed26 October 2026601413931a Banstead Road, Caterham, CR3 5QH
- Dismissed15 October 20266005184Streathbourne House, 75 Redehall Road, Smallfield, RH6 9QA
- Dismissed14 October 20266008351Development Site West of Southwood, Waller Lane, Caterham, CR3 5EA
- Dismissed13 October 20266007518Rosemary Cottage, Smallfield Road, Horne, Horley, RH6 9JP
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®