Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed22 October 20213265603

16-18 Southview Road, Warlingham, CR6 9JE

Planning appeal 3265603 at 16-18 Southview Road, Warlingham, CR6 9JE (Tandridge District Council) was dismissed on 22 October 2021 by Inspector Ayres J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area having regard to protected trees.

demolition of existing houses, nos. 16 & 18 Southview Road and the erection of two blocks of 14 units comprising 7x3 beds and 7x2 beds with shared under croft car park and street entry level to accommodate 21 spaces with an additional 3 off-street parking and extra 4 spaces within property boundary

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Ayres J
Postcode
CR6 9JE

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area having regard to protected trees
  • whether the proposal would provide adequate living conditions for future occupiers
  • the effect of the proposal on ecology

What decided it

The significant harm to the character and appearance of the area caused by the scale and mass of the development dominating the leafy, sylvan street scene, combined with inadequate living conditions for future occupiers and unresolved ecology concerns, substantially and demonstrably outweighed the modest housing delivery benefits.

The benefits of housing delivery and social and economic benefits of the scheme were outweighed by the significant harm to character and appearance, failure to provide adequate living conditions, and ecology concerns; the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DP7Policy DP8Policy CSP18Policy CSP17Policy DP19
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 71Paragraph 124Paragraph 126Paragraph 130Paragraph 174Paragraph 180
Judgments
Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v SSE [JPL 1982 P37]

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

138 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Tandridge District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Allowed29 October 20266006369
    Land at Thornhill, Westerham Road, Limpsfield, Oxted, RH8 0ED
  2. Dismissed26 October 20266014139
    31a Banstead Road, Caterham, CR3 5QH
  3. Dismissed15 October 20266005184
    Streathbourne House, 75 Redehall Road, Smallfield, RH6 9QA
  4. Dismissed14 October 20266008351
    Development Site West of Southwood, Waller Lane, Caterham, CR3 5EA
  5. Dismissed13 October 20266007518
    Rosemary Cottage, Smallfield Road, Horne, Horley, RH6 9JP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.