Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld4 February 20223265794

Premises known as 130 Clarence Street, SOUTHALL, Middlesex, UB2 5BW

without planning permission, the material change of use of the land to the rear of the premises for separate self- contained residential use

Authority
London Borough of Ealing
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Savage M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether, at the date the enforcement notice was issued, enforcement action could be taken in respect of the alleged breach (ground d)
  • Whether the steps required by the notice exceed what is necessary to remedy the breach of planning control (ground f)
  • Whether the compliance period specified in the notice is reasonable (ground g)

What decided it

The outbuilding was constructed after 13 February 2012, outside the ten-year enforcement period, and the appellant failed to prove continuous residential use from that date; additionally, the substantial operational development should have been addressed within four years, making demolition requirements excessive.

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.