Wayside Cottage, Chapel Walk, Hope, Hope Valley, S33 6RY

Planning appeal 3265928 at Wayside Cottage, Chapel Walk, Hope, Hope Valley, S33 6RY (Peak District) was dismissed on 15 July 2021 by Inspector Martinson P, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the Hope Conservation Area.

Replacement porch, 2 no. Cat-slide dormers to match adj property, 2no. Velux to rear roof slope, Removal of render to expose & reinstate original stonework, Erection of timber garden shed

Authority: Peak District
Appeal type: householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure: Written Representations
Development: residential · Householder developments
Inspector: Martinson P
Postcode: S33 6RY

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the Hope Conservation Area

What decided it

The proposed development would result in significant harm to the character and appearance of the Hope Conservation Area that would not be outweighed by any public benefits, contrary to the statutory duty under section 72(1) of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 and paragraph 196 of the NPPF.

the minor benefits from removal of the existing porch and replacement of windows were greatly outweighed by the significant harm to the character and appearance of the dwelling and the conservation area

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies: GSP3L3DMC3DMC5DMH7
National Planning Policy Framework: Paragraph 196

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

6 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision

An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter — Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.

Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app — Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.

Start your free trial

More decisions in Peak District

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

Notice upheld23 July 20263364767
Land Adjacent to B6054, East of Owler Bar, Holmesfield, S17 3BP
Dismissed14 July 20263367251
13 Sherwood Road, Tideswell, Buxton, SK17 8HS
Dismissed26 May 20266001246
Dove Head Farm, Buxton Road, Flash, Staffordshire, SK17 0TL
Dismissed15 May 20266002575
Land to the South East of The Glen, Hollinsclough Rake, SK17 0RF
Dismissed14 May 20263367299
Marquis of Granby, Hathersage Road, Bamford, S33 0EB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.