Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed5 November 20213265964

Land off High View, Chalfont St Giles, HP8 4HH

erection of 42 affordable dwellings and associated access, parking and landscaping

Authority
Buckinghamshire Council - Chiltern Area *
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Philpott M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether or not the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt and the purposes of including land within it
  • if the development is inappropriate, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the development

What decided it

The appellant failed to demonstrate an established affordable housing need for persons with strong local connections to the parish, meaning the paragraph 149(f) exception did not apply and the resulting Green Belt harm was not clearly outweighed by other considerations.

The substantial weight given to affordable housing delivery and other limited-weight benefits did not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to Green Belt openness and moderate harm to Green Belt purposes, so very special circumstances were not made out.

Framework references: 8, 11, 57, 137, 138, 147, 148, 149, 167, 169, 174, 180

Plan policies cited: CS Policy CS9, NP Policy H1, LP Policy GB2, CS Policy CS4, CS Policy CS24, LP Policy TR16

Judgments cited: Redhill Aerodrome Limited v SSCLG & Others [2014] EWHC 2476 (Admin); [2014] EWCA Civ 1386

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.