Planning appeal decision
158 - 160 Goldhawk Road, London, W12 8HJ
Planning appeal 3266088 at 158 - 160 Goldhawk Road, London, W12 8HJ (London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 12 November 2021 by Inspector Jones R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect on the character and appearance of the area and the Coningham and Lime Grove Conservation Area.
Insertion of three external roller shutters to shopfronts fronting Goldhawk Road and Stowe Road
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- other · Major general industry/storage/warehousing
- Inspector
- Jones R
- Postcode
- W12 8HJ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect on the character and appearance of the area and the Coningham and Lime Grove Conservation Area
What decided it
The roller shutters cause unacceptable less than substantial harm to the character and appearance of the Conservation Area and the locally listed Buildings of Merit, and the business security benefits do not justify this harm or outweigh the great weight required to be given to conservation of the heritage asset.
The less than substantial harm to the Conservation Area and locally listed Buildings of Merit was weighed against the business security benefits and economic growth considerations, with the harm prevailing because no alternative security measures were demonstrated and the appellant did not explain why internal shutters could not be incorporated.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DC8Policy DC1Policy DC4Key Principles CAG2Key Principles CAG3Key Principle SD5
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 81
- Judgments
- Miller-Mead v MHL [1963] 2 WLR 225
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Quashed On Legal Grounds18 September 20263355656Unit 1D, Woodstock Studios, 36 Woodstock Grove, London, W12 8LE
- Notice varied and upheld25 June 2026336281150 Rostrevor Road, London, SW6 5AD
- Notice varied and upheld9 March 202633337957 Ellaline Road, London, W6 9NZ
- Notice upheld26 September 20253334376First Floor Flat A, 770 Fulham Road, London, SW6 5SJ
- Notice upheld15 September 20253342440The Cottage, 1D Oaklands Grove, London, W12 0JD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®