Planning appeal decision
Hurworth Views, Neasham Road, Darlington, DL2 1QH
Planning appeal 3266272 at Hurworth Views, Neasham Road, Darlington, DL2 1QH (Darlington Borough Council) was allowed on 15 January 2024 by Inspector Harbottle M, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the private Gypsy, Traveller site is sustainably located in terms of access to services.
Without planning permission, (1) 4 touring caravans have been stationed on the land for residential use (2 of them being very recently occupied for that purpose) and that together with the works referred to at (2) and (3) below this constitutes an unauthorised change of use of the land from paddock land to a new private Gypsy, Traveller site; (2) the making of an unauthorised site access onto the land from Neasham Road; and (3) the laying of hardcore materials on the land to form an access road and hard standing, removal of hedgerow, the erection of fencing, gates and dog kennels and the installation of services for power and drainage of utility buildings (the works)
- Authority
- Darlington Borough Council
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Major traveller and caravan pitches
- Inspector
- Harbottle M
- Postcode
- DL2 1QH
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the private Gypsy, Traveller site is sustainably located in terms of access to services.
- The effect on the character of the rural area.
- The effect on highway safety.
- The effect on ecology, including nutrient neutrality.
- The living conditions of occupiers, particularly with regard to the potential for ground gas migration and contamination from infilled material.
- The need for and supply of Gypsy and Traveller pitches in Darlington.
- The personal circumstances of the appellants and their dependants.
What decided it
Appeal A succeeded because the harms identified (character, highway safety, ecology, contamination) were all capable of mitigation by condition and were outweighed by the sustainable location, pitch shortfall and appellants' personal circumstances, whereas Appeal B failed because it was not brought on ground (a) and its ground (c) case that no breach of planning control occurred was not made out.
The benefits of meeting Gypsy and Traveller accommodation need and the appellants' personal circumstances, combined with mitigable effects on character, highway safety, ecology and contamination, outweighed any residual concerns and justified granting permission in Appeal A.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SH 1Policy ENV 4Policy H 9Policy IN 2Policy ENV 3Policy DC 1Policy ENV 7Policy ENV 8Policy DC 4
- Judgments
- Tapecrown Ltd v FSS & the Vale of White Horse DC [2006] EWCA Civ 1744; Ardagh Glass v Chester CC & Quinn Glass [2009] EWHC 745 (Admin)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Darlington
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Notice varied and upheld19 March 20253349389Land on the North-west Side of Brickyard Farm Cottage, Neasham Road, Hurworth Moor, Darlington, DL2 1DL
- Planning permission granted27 January 20223266271Little Beck, Burma Road, Darlington , DL2 1QH
- Dismissed6 October 20266011909Grassed Verge of Carmel Road North, Cockerton, Darlington, DL3 8NN
- Allowed23 September 20266011290115 North Road, Darlington, DL1 2PS
- Dismissed13 August 20266004841Pavement Outside Santander, Bondgate, Darlington, DL3 7JB
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®