Planning appeal decision
46 Broad Road, Birmingham, B27 7XB
Planning appeal 3266388 at 46 Broad Road, Birmingham, B27 7XB (Birmingham City Council) was dismissed on 15 July 2021 by Inspector Raygen Z, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area with particular regard to density.
a mix of 1 and 2 bedroom apartments (up to 30 units) - Re-submission of 2018/03052/PA
- Authority
- Birmingham City Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Raygen Z
- Postcode
- B27 7XB
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area with particular regard to density
- Whether or not the proposal would provide appropriate living conditions for future residents with particular regard to outlook and light
- The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of surrounding residential properties with particular regard to privacy
- The effect of the proposal on ecology
- Whether or not the proposal includes appropriate drainage facilities
- Whether or not the proposal provides an appropriate level of affordable housing
- Whether or not the proposal provides an appropriate level of public open space
What decided it
The cumulative harm to character and appearance, living conditions, ecology, and failure to secure affordable housing and public open space, combined with fundamental conflict with the development plan, outweighed the benefits of housing delivery.
Although significant benefits of housing delivery and use of previously developed land were given appreciable and substantial weight respectively, these were not sufficient to outweigh the identified harm to character and appearance, ecology, living conditions and the lack of affordable housing and public open space, resulting in fundamental conflict with the development plan.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy PG3Policy TP27Policy TP30Policy TP28Policy TP44Policy TP8Policy TP7Policy TP6Policy TP2Policy TP47Policy TP31Policy TP9saved Policy 3.14A-Dsaved Policy 3.14C-Dsaved Policies 3.14A-Dsaved Policies 8.51-8.54
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 56
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Birmingham City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Allowed21 October 20253369411Indoor Market, 50 Edgbaston Street, Birmingham, B5 4RQ
- Allowed8 October 20253367570Northfield Shopping Centre, Bristol Road South, Northfield, B31 2JU
- Allowed22 August 20253358858Land at Ridgacre Road West, Birmingham , B32 1AX
- Allowed3 October 20243344730Bradford Works, 36, Barr Street, Jewellery Quarter, Birmingham, B19 3EG
- Allowed5 July 20243336011334-340 High Street, Harborne, Birmingham, West Midlands, B17 9PU
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®