Planning appeal decision
Indoor Market, 50 Edgbaston Street, Birmingham, B5 4RQ
Planning appeal 3369411 at Indoor Market, 50 Edgbaston Street, Birmingham, B5 4RQ (Birmingham City Council) was allowed on 21 October 2025 by Inspector Robinson N, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the diversity, vitality and overall shopping experience in Birmingham city centre.
outline application with all matters reserved for the demolition of existing indoor market building and the construction of new buildings providing up to 60,932sqm of new floorspace containing: up to 1,493sqm of commercial, business and service floorspace ( Use Class E); up to 745 apartments (Use Class C3) or up to 1,544 student bedrooms and associated communal student facilities (sui generis), or any combination of these residential uses but not exceeding a maximum of 1,544 residential units; together with associated plant, car parking and cycle parking facilities and works to the public realm adjacent to the proposed building(s) ”
- Authority
- Birmingham City Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Robinson N
- Postcode
- B5 4RQ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposal on the diversity, vitality and overall shopping experience in Birmingham city centre
- the effect of the proposal on the setting and significance of listed buildings 42-45 Upper Dean Street, the Church of St Martin in the Bull Ring and the statue of Nelson
What decided it
The absence of any development plan requirement to safeguard or replace the existing market, combined with the finding of no harm to the setting or significance of the nearby listed buildings, meant there was no policy conflict to weigh against the scheme's benefits.
the benefits of housing delivery, affordable housing contributions, townscape change and job creation weighed in favour of the scheme, with no harm identified on either main issue to weigh against them
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- BDP policy GA1BDP policy TP21UDP Policy TP4BDP policy TP26
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Birmingham City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Allowed21 October 20266012934157, Somerford Road, Birmingham, B29 5LB
- Dismissed20 October 20266011877248 Wheelwright Rd, Erdington, Birmingam, B24 8EH
- Allowed6 October 2026600642839 Gladstone Road, Sparkbrook, Birmingham, B11 1LP
- Allowed17 September 20266009473Unit 9a, Bikdale Avenue, Birmingham, B29 6UB
- Dismissed11 September 2026601108812 Sladefield Road, Ward End, Birmingham, B83NX
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®