Planning appeal decision
The Land Adjacent to Millers Lane, Fosse Way, Monks Kirby, CV23 0RT
Planning appeal 3267184 at The Land Adjacent to Millers Lane, Fosse Way, Monks Kirby, CV23 0RT (Rugby Borough Council) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 17 January 2023 by Inspector Dyer S, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the change of use to a gypsy and traveller site is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Planning Policy for Travellers Sites (PPTS), the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) and any relevant development plan policies.
change of use of land to use as a residential caravan site for 2 No. Gypsy families, each with 2 No. caravans, together with laying of hardstanding and erection of 2 No. stable/utility buildings
- Authority
- Rugby Borough Council
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Minor traveller and caravan pitches
- Inspector
- Dyer S
- Postcode
- CV23 0RL
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the change of use to a gypsy and traveller site is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Planning Policy for Travellers Sites (PPTS), the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) and any relevant development plan policies.
- The effect of the development on the openness of the Green Belt.
- The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the site and the surrounding area.
- Whether the location is suitable for a gypsy and traveller site, having regard to the proximity of services and the suitability of the highway network.
- Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal.
What decided it
The cumulative other considerations, including gypsy and traveller need and personal circumstances, did not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to the Green Belt combined with harm to character and appearance, intentional unauthorised development and biodiversity loss, so very special circumstances were not established.
the significant weight attached to unmet gypsy and traveller need, lack of a 5-year supply, absence of alternative sites and personal circumstances (including the best interests of the children) did not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to the Green Belt taken together with harm to character and appearance, intentional unauthorised development and biodiversity loss
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy GP2Policy DS2Policy SDC1Policy NE1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 148
- Judgments
- Lisa Smith v SSLUHC [2022] EWCA Civ 1391
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Rugby
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Notice varied and upheld14 May 20263377300Land Adjacent to White House Farm Industrial Estate, Oxford Road, Princethorpe, Rugby, Warwickshire, CV23 9QD
- Dismissed11 May 20266000671Bj House, Oxford Road, Ryton-on-Dunsmore, CV8 3EJ
- Notice varied and upheld7 May 20263348732The Chalet, Hinckley Road, Wolvey, LE10 3HQ
- Dismissed27 April 2026600188567 London Road, Dunsmore Heath, Stretton on Dunsmore, Warwickshire, CV23 9JB
- Notice upheld3 March 20263356878The Land at 97 Mckinnell Crescent, Rugby, Warwickshire , CV21 4AU
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®