Planning appeal decision
Romans Farm, Mill Road, Burnham-on-Crouch, CM0 8PZ
Planning appeal 3267306 at Romans Farm, Mill Road, Burnham-on-Crouch, CM0 8PZ (Maldon District Council) was dismissed on 18 October 2021 by Inspector Warder S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be suitably and sustainably located having regard to development plan and national policies.
the demolition of existing dwelling house and surrounding outbuildings barns and the development of 8no. dwelling houses and associated parking and access road
- Authority
- Maldon District Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Warder S
- Postcode
- CM0 8PZ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be suitably and sustainably located having regard to development plan and national policies
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- the effect of the proposal, including the car parking provision, on highway and pedestrian safety
- whether sufficient information has been provided to establish the effect of the proposal on protected species with particular regard to bats and great crested newts
- the effect of the proposal on flood risk
- whether the proposal would be likely to have a significant effect or an adverse effect, alone or in combination, on the Essex Coast Special Protection Areas or, if necessary, provide satisfactory mitigation
What decided it
The cumulative weight of policy conflicts across sustainability, character, highway safety, protected species, flood risk and Special Protection Areas, combined with the limited housing contribution, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits.
The benefits of providing seven additional housing units and the modest shortfall in five-year housing land supply (4.9 years) were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the adverse impacts of the proposal on sustainable location, character and appearance, highway safety, protected species, flood risk and Special Protection Areas; the tilted balance did not apply due to flood risk being a protected area of particular importance.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy S8Policy S1Policy D1Policy H4Policy T2Policy N2Policy D5Policy I1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 105Paragraph 130Paragraph 111Paragraph 180Paragraph 164Paragraph 167Paragraph 120Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Maldon
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Allowed8 April 20263373466Land Adjacent to Westerings, Purleigh, Essex, CM3 6PG
- Allowed2 February 20263365410Reddings Farm, Reddings Lane, Tillingham, CM0 7NX
- Dismissed9 January 20263367607The Emporium, 85-87 High Street, Maldon, Essex, CM9 5EP
- Dismissed12 December 202533734041 Mell Road, Tollesbury, Maldon, CM9 8SW
- Allowed8 December 2025337002215 Pump Mead Close, Southminster, CM0 7AE
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®