Planning appeal decision
Land off Wood Road, Codsall Wood, Near Wolverhampton, Staffordshire, WV8 1QR
Planning appeal 3267501 at Land off Wood Road, Codsall Wood, Near Wolverhampton, Staffordshire, WV8 1QR (South Staffordshire District Council) was dismissed on 21 October 2021 by Inspector Cragg D, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt for the purposes of the relevant development plan policies and the Framework.
Outline application for an agricultural workers dwelling including garage, all matters reserved except for access
- Authority
- South Staffordshire District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- agricultural · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Cragg D
- Postcode
- WV8 1QR
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt for the purposes of the relevant development plan policies and the Framework
- the effect on openness and the purposes of the Green Belt
- the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
- other considerations
- if the proposal is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify it
What decided it
The appellant failed to demonstrate that the functional need for a rural worker's dwelling could not be met by existing accommodation on the holding or suitable available accommodation locally, so no very special circumstances existed to outweigh the identified Green Belt harm.
The substantial weight given to Green Belt harm (inappropriateness, moderate loss of openness, limited countryside encroachment harm) plus moderate harm to character and appearance were not clearly outweighed by the other considerations (the functional need for rural workers), so very special circumstances did not exist.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy GB1Policy EQ4Policy EQ11Policy EV8
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 149Paragraph 150Paragraph 80
- Judgments
- Embleton Parish Council v Northumberland County Council [2013] EWHC 3631; Keen v Secretary of State for the Environment and Aylesbury Vale District Council [1996] JPL 753
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in South Staffordshire District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Dismissed21 October 20266012641The Granary, Lyne Hill Lane, Penkridge, ST19 5NT
- Allowed25 September 20266010537Land to the Rear of 6-12 Long Lane, Newtown, Wolverhampton, WS6 6AU
- Dismissed23 September 20266008866The Paddocks, Bridgnorth Road, Stourton, DY7 6QZ
- Dismissed12 August 20266010048Hilton Colliery Farm Cottage, Red Lane, Essington, WV11 2RD
- Dismissed15 July 20266007394White Lodge, Old Stafford Road, Slade Heath, WV10 7PH
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®