Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed29 September 20213267582

7, Ailsa Road, Twickenham, TW1 1QJ

a proposed side extension at second floor level, the replacement of the rear extensions with a single storey glazed extension and the loss of one 1 bedroom unit from 3 units into 1no. 4 bedroom flat and 1no. 3 bedroom flat

Authority
Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Allen M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether the loss of a unit of accommodation has been sufficiently justified

What decided it

The design quality of the pitched-roof extension and the removal of the unsympathetic flat-roofed element, combined with energy improvements, outweighed the minor harm from the loss of a single 1-bed unit.

The benefits of improved design quality and energy efficiency outweighed the minor harm from the loss of a single 1-bed unit of accommodation.

Plan policies cited: Policy LP1, Policy LP3, Policy LP4, Policy LP38

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.